I'm A Cockfighter
  • Home
  • Explore
    • United Nations of Cockfighting
    • UNOFC Digital Museum
    • Legalize Cockfighting Freedom
    • LCF Digital Museum
    • Cockfighting From All Over The World
    • CFAOTW Digital Museum
    • Gallery
    • Contact
    • Tell The World You Are A Cockfighter

Jurors can say NOT GUILTY when people break UNJUST LAWS

12/14/2012

0 Comments

 
Picture
Cockfighting is an Individual Liberty. | Cockfighting is a personal decision. Not a legal debate.
Jury nullification occurs when juries acquit criminal defendants who are technically guilty, but who do not deserve punishment. It occurs in a trial when a jury reaches a verdict contrary to the judge's instructions as to the law.

A jury verdict contrary to the letter of the law pertains only to the particular case before it. If a pattern of acquittals develops, however, in response to repeated attempts to prosecute a statutory offence, this can have the de facto effect of invalidating the statute. A pattern of jury nullification may indicate public opposition to an unwanted legislative enactment.

In the past, it was feared that a single judge or panel of government officials may be unduly influenced to follow established legal practice, even when that practice had drifted from its origins. In most modern Western legal systems, however, juries are often instructed to serve only as "finders of facts", whose role it is to determine the veracity of the evidence presented, and the weight accorded to the evidence, to apply that evidence to the law and reach a verdict, but not to decide what the law is. Similarly, juries are routinely cautioned by courts and some attorneys to not allow sympathy for a party or other affected persons to compromise the fair and dispassionate evaluation of evidence during the guilt phase of a trial. These instructions are criticized by advocates of jury nullification. Some commonly cited historical examples of jury nullification involve the refusal of American colonial juries to convict a defendant under English law.

Juries have also refused to convict due to the perceived injustice of a law in general, or the perceived injustice of the way the law is applied in particular cases. There have also been cases where the juries have refused to convict due to their own prejudices such as the race of one of the parties in the case.

Other cases have revealed that some juries simply refuse to render a guilty verdict in the absence of overwhelming direct or scientific evidence to support such a judgment. With this type of jury impaneled for the trial of a case, even substantial and competently presented circumstantial evidence may be discounted or rendered inconsequential during the jury's deliberation.

Read more.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Legalize Cockfighting Freedom Digital Museum.
    Picture
    Website: Legalize Cockfighting Freedom

    RSS Feed

    Categories

    All
    Asexuality And Sexuality
    Cockfighting Freedom
    Founding Father Quotes
    Gtte Quotes
    Irreligion And Religion
    Jury Nullification
    Liberty Quotes
    Liberty Tshirt Ideas
    Other Freedom
    Other Sports
    Press Release

    Archives

    April 2014
    March 2014
    January 2014
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
  • Home
  • Explore
    • United Nations of Cockfighting
    • UNOFC Digital Museum
    • Legalize Cockfighting Freedom
    • LCF Digital Museum
    • Cockfighting From All Over The World
    • CFAOTW Digital Museum
    • Gallery
    • Contact
    • Tell The World You Are A Cockfighter